Structure and diversity

In the 2015 account, the C. humilis group is characterised by globose stems, solitary or weakly branched, reaching about 7.5 cm in diameter. Ribs are divided into distinct, conical tubercles. A thickened taproot lies below the surface. [Larridon et al. 2015, p. 1514–1515]

Tubercle and spine appearance varies among subspecies. POWO currently accepts five units at this rank. C. humilis subsp. tenuissima has a separate profile, because material called C. tenuissima in older papers belongs to this taxon. [2-WWW]

Species boundaries in the literature

The accepted name is Copiapoa humilis (originally Echinocactus humilis). The 2015 analysis separated C. australis, previously described as C. humilis subsp. australis. Both morphological differences and the position of the material in the chloroplast tree supported this. [2-WWW] [Larridon et al. 2015]

Compared with C. australis, typical C. humilis has more prominent tubercles. The molecular result placed C. laui close to this group, despite its earlier association with C. hypogaea. Separating these names clarifies attribution of data on structure and propagation. [Larridon et al. 2015]

Scope of the regeneration experiments

Somatic embryogenesis studies concerned a horticultural monstrose form of subspecies tenuissima. The authors described the studied material's dark epidermis, lack of spines and white areoles. These features and responses to media refer to this particular form. The experiment is described in detail in the article on regeneration. [Lema-Rumińska et al. 2013]

Synonyms and names in the literature

Echinocactus humilis [2-WWW]